- Scaling Agencies with Profit
- Posts
- Why most churn initiatives fail
Why most churn initiatives fail
You're skipping steps
Hey,
One thing before we get into it:
I hosted a webinar on how we 2x’d revenue and 3x’d profit at our agency.
It’s ~30 minutes long and will give you the frameworks you need to potentially increase your profits to 30% or more.
You can't attack churn directly.
I know that sounds counterintuitive coming from someone who talks about retention constantly, but it's the truth, and I wish someone had told me this years ago before I learned it the hard way.
What usually happens is: Agency owner reads about the importance of retention. Gets fired up. Maybe they saw a stat about how reducing churn by a few percentage points can double profitability, or they just lost a big client and the pain is fresh.
So they take action. They redesign their onboarding process. They start doing quarterly business reviews. They create a client success role, maybe promote someone internally or hire for it. Real, tangible steps. Good intentions all around.
And then one of two things plays out.
Either the whole thing fails to launch. The team nods along in the meeting where it's announced, then goes back to doing exactly what they were doing before. The new onboarding process gets used for two clients, then abandoned. The quarterly reviews happen once, maybe twice, then fall off the calendar. Nobody says anything. It just... fades.
Or (and this one is almost worse) it works for a little while. Churn dips. Clients seem happier. The owner feels vindicated. Then three months later, everyone's backslid to their old behaviors and the numbers are right back where they started. The initiative dies a death and nobody holds a funeral for it.
At this point, the owner draws a perfectly reasonable but completely wrong conclusion: retention is just hard for their business. Their clients are different. Their market is more competitive. Their service is inherently short-term. It's just the nature of agency work, and you have to accept a certain level of churn as the cost of doing business.
But that's not what happened. What happened is they tried to solve a downstream problem without ever touching the upstream issues that were actually causing it. They were treating symptoms while the disease kept running underneath everything.
There's an order to this that works, and it's not the order most people expect.
First, you need data. And I don't mean the vague sense of how things are going that most agency owners carry around in their heads. I mean real numbers. Concrete client retention rates broken down by account manager, by service line, by client size. Client results metrics that tell you whether you're delivering, or not. Team productivity numbers that show you who's at capacity, who's drowning, and who has room. Dashboards that tell you the truth about your business even when the truth is uncomfortable.
Most agencies don't have this. They have a P&L that their bookkeeper sends over monthly and maybe a rough sense of which clients are happy based on who's complaining and who isn't. That's not data. That's vibes. And you cannot fix a business running on vibes.
Second (and this is the part that almost everyone wants to skip) you need management systems.
Clear objectives for every role. Defined metrics that tell each person what "good" looks like in their position. Managers who know how to manage, not just people who were great at doing the work and got promoted into overseeing other people doing the work. Accountability structures that mean something. Regular cadences where performance is reviewed, discussed, and acted on.
I cannot overstate how many agencies I've worked with where the management layer is the single biggest bottleneck to everything they're trying to accomplish. The reason being, nobody ever taught them how to manage.
They were great strategists or great account people who got a title bump, and now they're expected to drive performance across a team without any of the tools or frameworks to do it. So they default to either micromanaging everything or being completely hands-off, and neither of those approaches creates consistent execution of anything.
Third (and only after the first two are in place) client retention systems. The onboarding improvements. The quarterly reviews. The proactive communication cadences. The expansion conversations. The things that most people try to implement first.
This order matters because each layer genuinely depends on the one below it.
Without data, you're guessing at what's causing churn. And your guesses will be wrong at least half the time. You'll pour energy into fixing your onboarding when the real problem is that one account manager has a 20% monthly churn rate and nobody knows it because there's no dashboard showing churn by person.
You'll redesign your client communication process when the actual issue is that your team is so overloaded they physically don't have time to communicate proactively. You'll implement solutions to problems you don't have while the problems you do have keep bleeding you out.
Without management systems, you can't get your team to consistently do the retention work even if you design it perfectly. You roll out a beautiful new process. Half the team follows it. The other half doesn't. Nobody gets called on it because there are no clear expectations, no defined metrics, no accountability rhythm. The people who don't follow the process see that nothing happens when they ignore it, so eventually even the people who were following it stop bothering. The whole thing drifts back to baseline within a quarter.
When you tell a team to execute retention behaviors without having the management infrastructure to support and enforce those behaviors, they push back.
It sounds like: "Why are we changing this? Things are fine. Clients leave sometimes, that's just how it goes in our industry." And because you don't have the data to prove them wrong, and you don't have the management systems to hold them accountable to a different standard, they win that argument through inertia. The status quo is heavy, and without real leverage, it doesn't move.
An agency owner comes to me ready to fix churn.
They're motivated, they're committed, they want to build better onboarding and better communication and a better overall client experience.
And I have to be the one to slow them down.
Because I know that if I help them build beautiful retention systems on top of a broken foundation, those systems are not going to survive contact with reality.
We'll get short-term results that make everyone feel great for a few weeks, and then we'll watch the whole thing unravel by month three when the team reverts to old habits and there's no infrastructure to pull them back.
So instead, we start with the boring stuff. The unsexy, invisible work that nobody can see from the outside and that makes for terrible before-and-after screenshots.
It takes longer to see results this way, and I won't pretend otherwise. There's no quick win in the first two weeks. No dramatic transformation to point at. Just the slow, methodical work of building a foundation that can actually hold weight.
But when the results come - and they do come - they stick. They compound. They become permanent. Because you didn't just wallpaper over the cracks. You fixed the structure underneath, and now everything you build on top of it stays standing.
One more thing worth mentioning, and it's something that surprises almost every agency owner I work with.
This same foundation - data, management systems, accountability - fixes about 80% of agency problems, full stop.
Profitability issues, delivery issues, team performance problems, capacity bottlenecks, pricing challenges. They're all connected. They're all downstream of the same root causes. When you can see what's happening in your business, and your team is being managed against clear objectives, and there's real accountability for outcomes - most of the problems that kept you up at night start resolving themselves almost as a side effect.
Fix the foundation, and you fix almost everything. I've seen it happen enough times now that I'd bet on it every single time.
Nick
