You cannot attack churn directly

Hey, quickly before you read about my experience dealing with churn, I’d like to offer you the tools necessary to build a complete list of the essential metrics for your agency.

Get them here:

1. Download the free KPI checklist now: KPIs that will take your agency to $10 Million in revenue.

2. Download the Master Dashboard now: Track all your KPIs in one easy place for better accountability and tracking.

You cannot attack churn directly.

What typically happens is:

An agency owner may encounter a statistic about how reducing churn by a few percentage points doubles profitability. Maybe they have just lost a significant client and the pain is fresh enough to motivate action. They get fired up. They take tangible steps and redesign their onboarding process, they start running quarterly business reviews and they create a client success role, perhaps promoting someone internally or hiring for it.

And then one of two things plays out, and neither is good.

In the first version, the whole initiative fails to launch. The team nods along in the meeting where it's announced. They go back to doing exactly what they were doing before. The new onboarding process is used for all of two clients and then abandoned. The quarterly reviews happen once, maybe twice, and then fall off the calendar. Nobody says anything. The thing simply fades into the background, like an exercise routine started in January.

In the second version, which is somehow worse, the initiative works for a while. Churn dips. Clients seem happier. The owner feels vindicated. Then, around the three-month mark, everyone backslides into their old behaviours and the numbers return to baseline. The initiative dies a death and nobody holds a funeral for it.

At this point, the owner arrives at a reasonable but completely wrong conclusion. Retention is just hard for their business. Their clients are different, their market is more competitive or their service is inherently short-term. It is, they decide, simply the nature of agency work.

But that isn't what happened at all.

What happened is that they tried to solve a downstream problem without ever addressing the upstream conditions producing it.

They were treating symptoms while the underlying disease kept running, untouched, beneath everything.

First, you need data.

Not the vague sense of how things are going. You need concrete client retention rates broken down by account manager, by service line, by client size. Client results metrics that tell you whether you are delivering or not. Team productivity numbers showing who is at capacity, who is drowning, and who has room.

Second, you need management systems.

• clear objectives for every role

• defined metrics that tell each person what "good" looks like in their position

• managers who know how to manage

• regular cadences in which performance is reviewed, discussed, and acted on

I cannot overstate the number of agencies I've worked with where the management layer is the single biggest bottleneck to everything else they are attempting. Nobody ever taught these people how to manage. They were great strategists or account leads who received a title bump, and now they are expected to drive consistent performance across a team without any of the tools or frameworks for it. So they default to either micromanaging everything or to being completely hands-off - neither of which produces consistent execution of anything, let alone something as nuanced as retention behaviour.

Third, and only once the first two are in place, client retention systems.

All the things most people instinctively try to implement first.

Each layer depends on the one below it.

Without data, you are guessing at what's causing churn. And your guesses will be wrong at least half the time.

You will pour energy into redesigning your onboarding when the real problem is that one account manager has a 20% monthly churn rate that nobody knows about because there is no dashboard tracking it.

You will rebuild your communication process when the underlying issue is that your team is so overloaded they physically cannot communicate proactively.

You will implement solutions to problems you don't have, while the problems you do have continue to bleed you out.

Without management systems, you cannot get your team to consistently execute the retention work, even if you design it perfectly. You roll out a process. Half the team follows it and the other half doesn't. Nobody is called on it because there are no clear expectations, no defined metrics, no accountability rhythm. The people who ignore the new process see that nothing happens to them, so eventually even the people who were following it stop bothering. The whole thing drifts back to baseline within a quarter.

So an agency owner comes to me ready to fix churn.

Motivated, committed, eager to build better onboarding and better client experience.

And I have to be the one to slow them down.

Because I know that if I help them build elegant retention systems on top of a broken foundation, those systems will not survive contact with reality. We will get short-term results that feel exhilarating for a few weeks. We will watch them unravel by month three.

So we start instead with the boring work. Data, management, accountability. The invisible infrastructure that nobody outside the company can see - and that, in my experience, fixes about 80% of an agency's problems as a kind of side effect.

Fix the foundation, and almost everything downstream of it starts to resolve.

If you want a deeper look at the management side specifically - how to coach a team into reliably executing retention behaviour week after week - this is the video I'd point you to:

Nick